New research suggests that the planet's intriguing tesserae might conceal evidence of cosmic collisions. Venus surprising features

The intriguing surface of Venus has long puzzled scientists in the planetary sciences community. While our neighboring celestial bodies, such as Mercury and Mars, showcase a plethora of craters, Venus seems to be lacking in this characteristic feature. Recent studies, however, are turning heads and suggesting that perhaps the answer to this mystery lies in the enigmatic formations known as "tesserae." Planetary scientists have revealed that rather than a dearth of impact craters, the planet's surface may be concealing the remnants of cosmic collisions in plain sight.

The Role of Tesserae in Understanding Venusian Crater Formation

Tesserae, a hallmark of Venusian geology, are extensive and complex surface formations that can span thousands of kilometers. They often exhibit a unique topography characterized by densely packed wrinkle ridges, giving them an appearance akin to corrugated iron sheets. These features are the result of volcanic activities, where lava emerges from the mantle, solidifies, and leaves behind a residual structure referred to as residuum.

The research team, comprised of Ivan López from the Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Evan Bjonnes from the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, and Vicki Hansen from the Planetary Science Institute in Arizona, assert that the formation of tesserae correlates with impact events. These findings, revealed in a publication from Space on November 7, 2024, challenge previous understandings of Venus' surface history.

Evaluating Crater Presence on Venus

To date, approximately 1,000 craters have been cataloged on Venus, a number that pales in comparison to the abundant cratering seen on the Moon, Mars, and even Mercury. Notably, no impact craters exceeding 300 kilometers (186 miles) in diameter have been observed. This discrepancy begs the question: Are we failing to recognize the geological markers of impacts?

Hansen pointed out the misconception prevalent in prior investigations: focusing solely on craters as visible holes in the ground. Instead, these tesserae could represent a different manifestation of impact craters. "Who would have thought flat, low-lying terrain or a big plateau is what an impact crater would look like on Venus?" she questioned. This paradigm shift could indicate that many assumed flat terrains might actually be former impact sites, reshaped by the planet's dynamic geological history.

Understanding Venus requires acknowledging the planet's tumultuous geological past that dramatically altered its surface. Episodes of global volcanism, particularly those occurring over the last half billion years, have obscured many impact sites by resurfacing significant portions of Venus. Previous assumptions suggested that this activity had erased most evidence of ancient impacts.

Investigating Haastte-baad: A Case Study

The research team focused on Haastte-baad, a tessera measuring about 1,500 kilometers wide (approximately 900 miles), to understand the mechanisms of crater formation on the planet. Using advanced modeling techniques on radar maps, they attempted to recreate the historical conditions of Venus, which featured a markedly thinner crust known as the lithosphere.

Interestingly, the lithosphere today measures approximately 112 kilometers (70 miles) in thickness, making it nearly impenetrable to asteroid impacts, whereas billions of years ago, a significantly hotter interior rendered the lithosphere only about 10 kilometers (6 miles) thick. This thin crust would have allowed large asteroid impacts to penetrate through the surface, facilitating lava flow and ultimately leading to the creation of tesserae like Haastte-baad.

The implications of these findings are profound. If confirmed, this model suggests that Haastte-baad formed as a result of a large asteroid impact that allowed lava to spill into the resulting void, reshaping the superficial geology of Venus. As the convective flow of the mantle continued, it washed away the residuum, lowering the elevation of the tessera. Hansen likens this series of events to "pea soup with a scum forming on top," emphasizing the layered complexities of Venusian

The narrative continues with intriguing concentric rings that can be found at Haastte-baad. Such formations echo similar structures observed on the icy moons of Jupiter, suggesting a second impact had occurred. Rather than impacting an oceanic layer typical of the Jovian moons, these rings indicate a collision against the harder crust of Venus while lava filled the ensuing depression. Modeling indicates that this second asteroid measured around 70 kilometers (45 miles) in diameter.

Such double impacts, although rare, have precedents elsewhere in the solar system, including documented instances on Earth. The possibility of dual impacts in the same locale offers a fresh avenue for planetary scientists to consider in future research, especially given the size and age of Haastte-baad, which positions it as a highly suitable candidate.

Dating the Events: Between 1.5 and 4 Billion Years Ago

Modeling further narrows down the time frame for these impactful occurrences to a range between 1.5 and 4 billion years ago. Fortuitously, Haastte-baad remains one of the limited areas on Venus that has not undergone significant resurfacing due to subsequent lava flows. The implication of this finding is significant: If this tessera reveals evidence of past impacts, it could be Venus' oldest and largest impact structure. The insight it provides could illuminate earlier planetary processes and enhance our understanding of Venusian evolution.

As we reconsider the role of tesserae in our understanding of crater formation on Venus, it becomes clear that our approach to studying this enigmatic planet needs reevaluation. Determining whether all tesserae are linked to impact features may require further investigation and will undoubtedly occupy planetary scientists in the coming years.

The implications of the research extend beyond simply identifying impact sites; they can reshape our understanding of Venusian geology and its development over eons. The prospect that these tesserae could serve as windows into a planet's distant past opens doors to new research avenues and questions we may not have considered before.

Potential Research Directions

1. Further imaging and radar analysis of other tesserae on Venus to identify possible impact features.

2. Geochemical studies to analyze the residual materials associated with reported tesserae.

3. Comparative analyses between Venus' tesserae and similar structures found on other planetary bodies, including Earth and the Moon.

4. Investigating the relationship between volcanic activity and impact events throughout Venus' geological timeline, aiding in a clearer understanding of planetary evolution.

FAQs

**What are tesserae on Venus?**

Tesserae are extensive surface formations on Venus that appear wrinkled, often resembling corrugated iron. They may represent ancient impact sites.

**How many craters have been identified on Venus?**

As of now, there are approximately 1,000 known craters on Venus, though this number is significantly lower than those found on other planetary bodies like Mercury and Mars.

**What is the significance of the Haastte-baad tessera?**

Haastte-baad is pivotal because it may represent one of the largest and oldest impact structures on Venus, providing insight into the planet's geological history and processes.

Venus Surface

Understanding Venus' surface characteristics and geological history remains a pursuit not just of curiosity but also essential for interpreting planetary evolution within our solar system. The discovery of potential impact features lurking beneath the surface of tesserae underscores the significance of revisiting geological hypotheses and methodologies in planetary science.

As research evolves, the persuasion that our comprehension of Venus may be revolutionized comes into focus. The notion that once overlooked characteristics could dramatically alter our understanding exemplifies the ever-transcending nature of science. As noted by Hansen, this research opens a remarkable avenue into the challenges faced when interpreting the surfaces of other celestial bodies: "If this is really an impact structure, it would be Venus' oldest and largest, giving us a rare glimpse into Venus' past and informing early planet processes."

The journey through the mysteries of Venus and potential cosmic impacts continues to encourage the scientific community to keep looking deeper—and perhaps to view the familiar with fresh eyes.